
Table
of Contents
1. Introduction
2. The Nadars and their Social Setting, Past and Present
3. Kinship and Marriage among the Northern Nadars
4. Nadar Religious Beliefs and Practices
5. Nadar Local Associations
6. Conflict in Northern Nadar Local
Associations (1): The Case of Aruppukottai
7. Conflict in Northern Nadar Local Associations (2): Palayampatti and Pattiveeranpatti
8. The Changing Role of Nadar Local Associations
9. Twenty Years of Change: 1970-90
10. Conclusions: The Northern Nadars Agency and Ideology
End Notes
Glossary
Bibliography
Index
Book
Description
The Nadars are a low Indian caste, in terms of
status, power, and wealth. This work analyzes the upward mobility of the
Northern Nadars of Tamil Nadu within the caste hierarchy. The author studies
two types of changes--caste mobility and social evolution--thereby challenging
the notion of the caste system being a rigid order.
Great
insight to the Nadar Community to the Young generation, January 13, 2002
Reviewer: Mayilvahanan Nadar from India
It is a great book, which gives the picture of how Nadars grown because of
their unity among themselves and helping their community in all their causes.
It is a must for every Nadar to read this Book, If you are a Nadar you have to
have this book, If you are not, it is a great book to read about the community
which came up to the higher economy status by their sheer hard work, Dedication
and their self formed Organisation support.
Conflict,Competition
and power Equation Among the Nadars, June 24, 2000
Reviewer: Muthuraman.P from Tamilnadu,India
Dennis Templeman's work on Northern Nadars had emerged out of Robert
Hardgrave's study, The Nadars Of Tamilnadu:The political culture of a community
in change (1969),often considered as the first classic on Tamil Nadars. Exactly
after 30 years of his mentor's work Templeman came out with his masterpiece
about how the disjunctive social process of conflict, competition and power
equation among the caste members and between castes were instrumental in weakening
the effectiveness of Nadars caste association at the grassroot level, popularly
known "uravinmurais". The mark of difference between Hardgrave and
Templeman studies are that the former primarily dealt with how the Nadar caste
as a whole rose to a 'solid' and 'forward caste' status achieving 'power' and
wealth from a lowly position in the social hierarchy i.e., just above the
untouchable, defined the commonly prevalent notion that Hindu caste system is
overtly rigid with no scope for any upward mobility. In addition, this work further thrown light on the sphere of
'official' state and national government and on the impact of Nadar caste and class
affiliations, intercaste relations and politics within Nadar caste association
i.e., Nadar Mahajana Sangham, on Nadars’ interaction with regional and state
level political parties. Whereas, the later work focuses on the uncovered
dimension of Hardgrave's work i.e., conflict within local association, between local
associations and between Nadars and other communities in local settlement,
which focuses upon the manipulation and use power and the struggle for power at
the grassroot level rather than at the regional and national level. Primarily
Templeman's work examined these local associations under which caste as a whole
achieved great cohesiveness and effectiveness, as well as the conditions which
ultimately have led to their present weakened state.
The
methodology used by Templeman to examine the political and social conflict of
Nadars was to a large extent influenced by the anthropological study of law,
unlike the ethnographical approach used by the conventional anthropologists.
The author used legal ethnography to study caste conflicts, which is similar to
the strategy oriented game theory approach adopted by F.G.Bailey and Fredrik.
Barth. This work is based on intensive field study over a period of twenty five
years in five distinct Nadar settlements i.e., Madurai (a large town), Aruppukottai
(a small town), Palayampatti and Pattiveeranpatti ( two villages) and Palamedu (a
small village).
This
book consists of ten chapters, and the first three chapters deal about Nadars’
ethos, historical development of a caste, changes occured, family, marriage and
kinship pattern and the religious tradition and beliefs of the caste. The fourth chapter is devoted for Nadar local
association in general whereas the fifth chapter highlights how the association
began to shed some of their traditional characteristic features were recasted
to promote and project Nadars’ interest in changing circumstances. Chaters six
and seven vivids the nature of conflict of the aforesaid five Nadar
settlements. The eigth and nineth capters give a complete picture of how the
changes have occurred in the caste and its association within a span of thirty
years i.e., the time lag between Hardgrave's work to the present author's work
on Nadars. Templeman had mentioned that
the Nadars’ caste association not only in the sample villages but all the Nadar
settlements in Tamilnadu has assumed a new role as service organisation
catering the needs of both Nadars and others, i.e., from the communal character
to secular character. Templeman diagnosed three cardinal principles that gained
currency among the Northern Hindu Nadars viz., 1) Caste as an endogamous group
2) importance of relative caste status and 3) Usefulness of local association.
The author's following observation has a merit i.e., "the Nadars believe
they can perceive the conditions in which different values and actions will be
effective, and in their ability to modify their behaviour and values in order
to take advantage of such emerging opportunities". While concluding, Templeman talks about
Northern Nadars’ agency and ideology and revealed the fact that how Nadars have
continually reworked their social institutions while working within them. He has borrowed the agency approach generally
used by antropologists concerned with law. His comparision of Nadars’ mobility pattern with Saraswat Brahmins
and Jatavs and how Nadars’ mobility pattern is superior than the other two
communities are quite interesting and unique among the backward castes.