You will be meeting regularly with your advisor(s), member(s) of the math or stats disciplines faculty, throughout the process.
In addition to your advisor, it is strongly recommended that you have a SECOND READER for your paper so that you receive constructive suggestions from more than one person (advisor) way before you submit your near-final version to the mathematics faculty. This second reader should be another (preferably math) faculty member.
You should give a version of your paper
to your second reader at AT LEAST TWO WEEKS before your near final version
is due. The idea is that your near final version has been read
and commented on by at least two faculty before the other math
faculty members read them.
We suggest that you have your second reader chosen at the beginning of
the second semester of your project so that he/she is aware of the
time required to read your paper.
The Senior Seminar is meant to be an integrative experience for you. You may be combining things you learned from more than one class. You may be combining your mathematical knowledge with a personal interest. Certainly the paper will require you to use your writing skills as well as your mathematical skill. For many students, the presentation is a totally new experience, requiring mastery of the subject matter, technical control over the mode of presentation, and public speaking skills. We are sure you will find your year-long experience challenging while at the same time, fun and worthwhile.
|   | Spring 2005-Fall 2005 | Fall 2005- Spring 2006 | Spring 2006-Fall 2006 | Fall 2006- Spring 2007 |
| Advisor Chosen | Jan 17 | Sep 2 | Jan 17 | Sep 8 |
| General Area Chosen | Jan 17 | Sep 2 | Jan 17 | Sep 8 |
| Specific Topic Chosen | Feb 11 | Sept 30 | Feb 11 | Sept 30 |
| Project proposal with mathematical foundation and research plans due: | May 3 | Dec 12 | May 3 | Dec 11 |
| Second reader's access to draft : | at least two weeks before near final version is due | at least two weeks before near final version is due | at least two weeks before near final version is due | at least two weeks before near final version is due |
| Near final version due | Nov 15 | March 27 | Nov 17 | March 29 |
| Discussion with faculty committee | Nov 28-29 | April 10-12 | Nov 28-29 | April 9-11 |
| Presentations | Dec 5-7 | April 17-20, 24-26 |
Dec 4-6 | April 16-19, 23-26 |
| Final version due | Dec 12 | May 1 | Dec 11 | May 1 |
And you will also be given a copy of the 2005 new evaluation form This eval form will be given to everyone who attends your presentation. This is so that you will know the attributes that will be assessed.
Usually, it takes about 15 minutes per student for this discussion.
You are requested to incorporate changes or suggestions from the
faculty committee into your final version of your report and also
into your presentation.
Since your choice of advisor and general area is important to you, you should probably actually make these choices during christmas break or summer break if you are starting in Spring or Fall semesters, respectively.
You are expected to meet about twice a month with your advisor throughout the academic year. Towards the end of the first semester, your advisor will expect to be seeing appropriate progress toward completion of the paper. You should be becoming clearly more expert on your topic. You should be gathering the necessary data or carrying out the necessary computer work, if appropriate. The paper should be taking shape. By the middle of the second semester, you should start preparing your presentation as well.
| 30% | Active participation throughout the process |
| 10% | Project Proposal with mathematical foundation and research plans |
| 30% | Final written paper |
| 30% | 40-min presentation |
Active participation throughout the process means primarily that you have worked substantially in between meetings with your advisor and you have attended all the math senior seminar presentations during the two semesters that you are working on your senior seminar project.
Your overall course grade will be decided by your advisor in consultation with the rest of the math discipline faculty.
To enhance the value of the presentation component of the course, audience members will fill out the evaluation forms after each presentation. Your advisor may use these comment forms to help determine your grade for your presentation. However, the principal purpose of these forms is to provide you with useful feedback.
In addition to your advisor, you should have a SECOND READER for your paper so that you receive constructive suggestions from more than one person (advisor) way before you submit your near-final version to the mathematics faculty. This second reader should be another (prerably math) faculty member. And second reader should have a draft of your paper at least two weeks before the near final version is due.
In pure mathematics, if you choose to present a famous result, you might find it hard to be original. In this case you might want to examine the presentation of this result in two reference works. You could combine what you felt was best from these two presentations, keeping in mind your particular audience. You could perhaps add an example that you worked out yourself.
In applied mathematics, applying something you learned in a class to your own situation or your own data would be plenty original.
Regardless of your topics and of the areas of your topics, if you are actually using what you learned in some of your advanced math courses here, you're probably on track. What to include and what to omit in your paper and presentation is subtle; your advisor should give you help here.
Here is a small sample of previous Math 4901 papers:
The coordinator of Math 4901 Senior Seminar for 2005-2007 is
Peh Ng.
Please feel free to email me at
pehng@morris.umn.edu
or stop by my office (Science 2330) if you have any questions at
any time, and please do not procrastinate in asking if you are unsure of something.
Back to [
Math Discipline's HomePage ]
© 2001-2005 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and
employer.
Last Modified Wednesday, March 22, 2006
Page URL: http://www.morris.umn.edu/academic/math/policies-seniorsem05-06.html