University of Minnesota, Morris
April 30, 2004
The Campus Assembly met on
April 30 at 4:30 p.m. in the Science Auditorium to discuss the Variable Topics
Courses as presented below.
At the October 15, 2003,
meeting, the Curriculum Committee resolved to revise the policies that
currently regulate those courses known as Variable Topics Courses. It had come to the attention of the
committee that courses presented under the rubric of Variable Topics had become
permanent parts of the university curriculum without ever having been approved
by the Committee or by the Campus Assembly. The principle of Variable Topic was to assist disciplines in
adding courses without having to await the potentially lengthy process of
approval through the Curriculum Committee. Nevertheless, this benefit is out-weighted by the
institutional need to have broad-based scrutiny of course offerings. As well, the provisional course
approval process guarantees that reasonable proposals can be approved within a
matter of days. As a result, the
major reasons for the existence of the Variable Topics courses no longer reach
the level of importance necessary to continue the practice. Therefore, the Committee approved the
following policy:
I.
All courses must receive
Curriculum Committee approval (either provisional or regular) before being
offered.
II.
Courses receiving
provisional approval would remain active for the duration of the current
catalog. If a course is to be
offered beyond the current catalog, it must be presented to the Curriculum
Committee for regular approval in time for Campus Assembly approval, to allow
inclusion in the next catalog.
III.
All variable topics
courses (xx00) with either be converted to course cluster headings or be
eliminated from the catalog, as each discipline thinks best.
IV.
New course cluster
headings must be approved by the Curriculum Committee before being included in
the catalog.
Fritz
Schwaller said this would be a very helpful tool to have because there have
been courses that were added within the discipline that did not go through the
Curriculum Committee and Campus Assembly.
He also believes it would provide clarity for students as they look at
our catalog. Mary Elizabeth
Bezanson asked how we will deal with provisional courses. Schwaller said in the same manner we do
now. He added that we are
confronted with calendar issues because this is a bulletin year and the catalog
copy must be in the Twin Cities by December. Harold Hinds expressed concern about the lack of attendance
today and noted that he is aware that two of his colleagues could not attend
the meeting but he thought they would be opposed to this. Leslie Meek asked if he knew why they
were opposed. Hinds said he could
not speak on their behalf. There
was some concern that the term variable topics looks more official when listed
in the catalog. Schwaller said the
essence of the argument is that the Curriculum Committee is asking that all
courses go through them for provisional approval. Pete Wyckoff noted that this was presented from the
Curriculum Committee unanimously and he called the question. Schuman asked for a voice vote for all
those in favor of approving the motion.
Motion carried.
Adjourned
at 5:15 p.m.