University of Minnesota, Morris Campus Resources & Planning Committee Minutes November 19, 1998 NOTE - MEETING DATES FOR WINTER QUARTER ARE AT THE END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Members present: Sara Haugen, Maddy Maxeiner, Brenda Boever, Don Kenning, Andy Lopez, Tom Johnson, Ray Sibul, Jenny Dose, Gwen Rudney, Lowell Rasmussen, Jason Anderson, Nat Hart. Guests: Chris Wenner, Sam Schuman, Gary McGrath, Cathleen Brannen Maddy Maxeiner provided material about seeking private support. She explained that written material about fund-raising must be fluid but must also generate excitement. Sam Schuman stressed that in order for fund-raising to be successful, a community must buy into it. Andy Lopez wondered about providing more detailed lists of initiatives and components. Maxeiner replied that her document was an executive summary of a longer version featuring multiple paragraphs per item. Lopez asked whether the items were on-going or related to a one-time capital campaign. Maxeiner explained that the development paradigm changes and development officers seek to consistently build relationships that will be on-going and result in expanded giving. Schuman reminded the committee that the capital campaign seeks to raise an endowment. Nat Hart asked about avoiding limiting designations for contributions and Chris Wenner asked when the U last undertook a successful capital campaign. In the eighties, Maxeiner replied. Our goal is to raise 2.5 million and spend 5.5% annually. Schuman added that the capital campaign interest is not the only source of funding for the initiatives, which include student, faculty, and facilities/equipment concerns. Schuman updated the committee on a draft of the Compact. It will be congruent with the development document and will carry forward into Year 2 many items from last year's (first) compact. The CRPC will be given a final proposal draft and the chance to discuss it at an upcoming meeting. Andy Lopez suggested more formatting. Nat Hart wondered if technical upgrades should be mentioned under "faculty" or "support." Lopez wondered why the U isn't keeping up with IT staff compensation. Brannen mentioned that UMM is keeping up with UMTC, just not the market. Tom Johnson suggested that semester conversion needs to be mentioned as an on-going task. Schuman noted this and reminded the committee that it's a fiscal year 2000 document, not 1999. The Three Year Plan (3YP) subcommittee reported. They were unable to mesh the strategic goals with the Compact. They recommend deleting the prelude and combining an initial preamble (an expansion of the "best public liberal arts college" statement) with revised goals (including a separate section for academic progress) to constitute the academic plan. The committee responded favorably. Tom Johnson suggested adding "Continue developing meaningful ways of assessing student learning and the quality of academic programs." Maddy Maxeiner moved to approve the plan and Ray Sibul seconded. Tom Johnson wondered how the "best public liberal arts college" concept would be assessed. Schuman suggested it will lead to useful discussions of that being the best means. Hart stressed that any external documents be clear about what a public liberal arts college is. The committee passed the three year plan, which will be forwarded to the Executive Committee. Andy Lopez is seeking a student to join Ray Sibul and Brenda Boever on the NCA5c subcommittee. Also, the Tuition Task Force is working on a plan for twice-yearly tuition collection and banding under semesters. The CRPC will meet Tuesdays at 2 pm in the Behmler Conference Room during winter quarter. Meeting dates will be Jan 12, Jan 26, Feb 9, Feb 23, and March 9. Rebecca Webb