University of Minnesota, Morris
Campus Resources and Planning Committee
November 30, 2004
Members Present: Andy Lopez,
Sara Haugen, Mark Fohl, Jim Carlson, LeAnn Dean,
Matt
Croaston, Isaac Linehan-Clodfelter Sharon Van Eps,
Lowell
Ramussen, Maddy Maxeiner, Arne Kildegaard
Guests: Fritz
Schwaller and Tom Mahoney
(In these minutes: Recovered Facilities and Administrative
Costs Policy and Updating UMMıs Strategic Plan)
Schwaller reported that Tom
Mahoney compared our policy to other colleges that we compare ourselves to and
eventually came up with the principles for the use of Recovered Facilities and
Administrative costs. Currently U
of MN policy returns 85.5% of recovered Facilities and Administrative costs
(F&A, formerly IDC/ICR) to the coordinate campus that generated the
F&A. 2.5% of the recovered
amount is reserved for the library, leaving 83% to support sponsored projects
related activities at UMM as follows:
A: Support of the Grants Development Office (GDO).
1) Support for 25% time of the pre-award coordinator (or
current job title).
2) Support one student intern position.
3) Office operations and travel including professional
development travel.
4) Maintenance of a reserve equal to one yearıs
allocation ($21,500 based on FY04).
B: Any remaining funds will be available at the Deanıs
discretion with the following priorities:
1) Reimbursement to units for communications and supply
costs directly related to awards that generated F&A.
2) Matching money for proposals/awards that generate
F&A.
3) Incentive funds to encourage development of proposals
for external funding.
Jim Carlson asked what amount
we usually receive. Mahoney said
it has varied from a few hundred dollars to $26,000. Carlson made a motion to support the policy. Second by Mark Fohl. Motion carries.
Lopez suggested that CRPC
begin talking about updating the 2002-2005 Strategic Three-Year Plan that was
approved by Campus Assembly on 3/20/02 and asked the committee for their
suggestions on how to proceed.
Fritz Schaller said the leadership team worked on a similar version of
strategic goals at their retreat this year. Some suggestions/ideas to be added are as follows: Overall Technology Plan, Secure funding
for HFA Phase III, Secure funding for Library remodeling, and coping with
changes in state and federal resources. Arne Kildegaard wondered if we should dovetail what is
currently being done at the All-University level although he prefers how we
currently do it. Lopez said he
would like us to have our own plan.
He would also like a subcommittee to draft the first three paragraphs of
the plan. Maddy Maxeiner suggested
using some language that builds a coalition around our academic strengths,
i.e., undergraduate research with faculty. Lopez added that he would like CRPC to work on this for the
next two to three months with the hope of getting it to Campus Assembly before
the end of the academic year.
Sharon VanEps brought up a problem with student stipends and work study
jobs on campus and that students are often penalized. Schwaller said the leadership team talked about this very
issue this week although and are working through it. At this point, they do not have a clear cut answer.
CPRC will continue the
discussion about updating the plan at the next meeting.