Campus Resources and Planning
Committee
March 25, 2009
Present: Pete
Wyckoff, Bryan Herrmann, Sarah Mattson, LeAnn Dean, Ray Schultz,
Sara
Haugen, Heather Peters, Jacquie Johnson, Zak Forde, Karen Cusey,
Madeline
Maxeiner, Dave Swenson
Guests: Judy
Kuechle, Sandy Olson-Loy, Patrick Chester
Request
from Faculty Development Committee
Pete
reported that he received a request from the FDC seeking topics for the fall
faculty retreat. If committee
members have ideas, they should funnel the suggestions to FDC through Pete.
Updates
from Lowell Rasmussen
Senior
Legacy Project
Lowell
Rasmussen reported that the Senior Legacy Project is a tradition where the
senior class designates something they would like to do for the campus when
they graduate and they pledge to support it. This year the students are proposing a wind break along
Prairie Lane. Lowell believes this
is an insightful, well thought out project that fits into our Master Plan and
he highly recommends the project.
Motion to endorse the project was made by Kathy Julik-Heine, seconded by
Ray Schultz. So moved.
Printing
software management project
The
printing software management project discussion will be deferred to a later
meeting.
Background
on State budget and stimulus money
Jacquie
Johnson reported that she plans to present her budget reduction plan to the
Consultative Committee and this committee next week. The week after that, Linc
Kallsen from the Twin Cities budget office will be on campus to meet with
several groups on campus including the CRPC. He also plans to attend the community meeting on April
7. She believes it is important
for everyone in the campus community to have as much information as she can
offer. She has talked to Pete,
Colleen and Lowell about the roll of this committee both in this room and
outside. She believes it helps to
have all employee groups represented and that committee members have a
particular role in understanding and taking that understanding back to
constituent groups.
She also
reported that two weeks ago she attended a meeting on the Twin Cities campus
that included President Bruininks and Channing Riggs. At that time, President Bruininks was anticipating what the
Governor will say about the State of Minnesota receiving stimulus funds to restore
some of the cuts that he had recommended. The stimulus funds are problematic
because they are a one time only fund.
The guidelines and caveats are that education budgets canÕt be reduced
lower than they were in the 2006-07 budget year. What this means is that the Governor can reduce the
UniversityÕs budget even more than he had recommended just a little while ago
because when we get through this biennium, we will be at an even lower level of
a base budget than where we were when we started the budget a few months
ago. While the logic of the
stimulus funds makes sense, what we donÕt know at this point is how we can use
the funds. She also worries that
the funds can be easily misunderstood because it seems like a really thing when
it fact it hurts the University more.
The funds do not change our need to reduce spending for the next two
years. We will not be able to use
the stimulus funds for operating expenses and therefore we will probably not be
able to avoid lay offs.
Lowell
added that without knowing all of the details about the funds, at our Compact
meeting, we suggested that we were ready to move on several projects if they
felt we met the intent of the funding.
Instead of CREB loans to finance the wind turbines, we could replace
with stimulus funds which would eliminate the debt associated with the
turbines. We also suggested that
our green dorm could potentially fit into the project because it fits into
energy conversation and would create jobs. Jacquie added that both ideas seemed to be well
received. We do not believe any
decisions will be made until the end of May or early June but we have two
viable, compatible projects and weÕre ready to move if necessary. Jacquie also mentioned that the
ChancellorÕs office has a copy of the entire stimulus bill if anyone is
interested in reading it.
Lowell
distributed a handout created by Linc Kallsen that shows the visual
representation of the structural imbalance that we have. The handout was shared at the Compact
meeting with the purpose of letting the system officers know that we are
different from other campuses within the University system. All of the information will help us as
we move into our discussion next week of what we need to do. Jacquie also mentioned that it
was clear at the Compact meeting that we are encouraged and required to stay on
course with the budget reduction plan.